Sunday, February 9, 2014

Week 5: The Racialization of and Societal Indifference Around Prison Rape

Male Prison Rape: A Search for Causation and Prevention
Prison Rape Indifference


The two links above paint an interesting and disturbing picture of prison rape in the United States.  One shows two photos of a male and forces viewers to question their own value judgment when regarding a perceived prisoner vs. a non-prisoner.  The first photo shows the male in apparent plain, unassuming attire, and asks the question, “Would you joke about this man being raped?”  The second shows the same man, except he is now clad in the infamous orange prison jump suit with his prison identification number stenciled across his chest.  The caption on this photo reads, “How about now?”
The implication these photos demonstrate is a phenomenon that has almost become a perceived rite-of-passage for a prison inmate, as well as the source of many jokes of poor taste in mainstream American culture – that of prison rape.  These photos challenge mainstream discourse by humanizing the horrific act of prison rape (one might wonder how this act could ever become unhumanized), which statistics demonstrate has significantly increased in the last ten years.  Why would people deem it acceptable to marginalize a rape victim because they happen to be located in a prison setting, when it’s not as socially acceptable to do so to a non-inmate?  What power-privilege dynamics might be at play to justify this incongruity in the minds of mainstream Americans?
The next link is a story that highlights perceived racial dynamics that allegedly drive most occurrences of prison rape.  The article discusses presents the hypothesis that most rape circumstances in male prisons involve a white male as the victim and a black male (predominantly) and other white and 'Hispanic' males as the perpetrators.  The author cites statistics to validate this hypothesis.  One must approach the debate from a critical lens before positioning on the conclusions for this hypothesis; especially in terms of the solutions he presents to mitigate prison rape.  Through interviewing and survey techniques of white, black, and Latino inmates and prison staff, he quotes several black inmates as implying that blacks prefer to rape whites out of revenge for oppression of blacks by whites historically and at present.  He attempts to build a case around this point but the conjecture and research he cites must be challenged before taken at face value. 
He concludes the article by stating that races should be separated to protect the white man from rape, along with separating homosexuals from the general population.  
In my opinion, I find this article particularly interesting because it’s written by a British man lecturing at the University of Hawaii and it contains undertones of the inclination to subjugate the black man.  The author uses statistics to make implications that the white inmates are victims and the black inmates are the perpetrators.  I might be more inclined to support the claims made in this article had similar tactics not been used for centuries to subjugate black people, particularly black males, in this country.  I question the author’s motives, especially when he makes it a point to state that a much larger percentage of black males in prison are there for violent crimes, as opposed to white males.  He also makes several references to ‘black racism’, again painting the picture of the black man as a perpetrator.  He seems unaware of the fact that racism implies a power dynamic; even in the prison hierarchy the black man doesn’t hold a position of privilege and, therefore, cannot be racist. 
I don’t deny that his statistics might be correct in that white males are raped more than black or Latino males in prison.  I also don’t argue that the perpetrators tend to be black.  What I do argue is the picture this article paints of the black man because he’s black, not because of any other contributing factors to the rape phenomenon.  I also challenge the author’s ‘solutions’ to this problem, because they invariable single out the white man as needing to be saved.  The evidence posed, in my opinion, is very weak and does not support the solutions the author presented.

No comments:

Post a Comment